> So look like for whatever reason, Wonder's wotaskd eats almost double the RAM > than the vanilla one :-/
Which, in the grand scheme of things, is still not a lot? It's not like you have more than one per server. Cheers, Anjo Am 22.06.2010 um 18:51 schrieb Pascal Robert: > > Le 10-06-22 à 12:13, Aurélien Minet a écrit : > >> Hi Pascal >> >> On 06/22/2010 03:49 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: >>> We are migrating our apps from OS X Server 10.4 to CentOS Linux >>> (x86_64), and everything is working fine. But I did notice something : >>> wotaskd and JavaMonitor are eating a lot more RAM. On the OS X box, they >>> take 41 MB each, on Linux they take up to 140 MB each :-/ >>> >>> The JVM on OS X is : >>> >>> Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_13-121, mixed mode) >>> >>> On Linux : >>> >>> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 16.3-b01, mixed mode) >>> >>> So both are running the Server VM, the only different is Java 6 vs 5, >>> and 32 bits vs 64 bits. Still, I'm a bit amazed that it takes triple the >>> RAM. Both machines are running the same apps and the same number of >>> instances. >>> >>> Anyone have seen this? It's not a problem, I just think it's a bit strange. >> >> >> A few weeks ago I noticed that some of the wotaskd that were running were >> just in the top of memory consumers. >> Actualy I have a wotaskd which has 42 instances running consuming ~285Mo >> (resident memory), it's a Wonder version >> (06-01-2010 build for WO 5.3) running under Java 1.5 on an x86_32 Linux. >> I noticed that Monitor consume memory too but less than wotaskd. >> I had the idea of switching back to a vanilla version but profiling would be >> more helpful to understand why it's eating >> so much memory. > > Hum, I forgot to say that I also moved from the bundled version of > wotaskd/Monitor to the Wonder versions. So since the Linux box is not in > prod, I switched back to the 5.4.3 Apple version of the tools, and Monitor is > eating 68 MB, wotaskd is eating 62 MB. If I switch back to the Wonder > versions, wotaskd eats 107 MB, Monitor 73 MB. > > So look like for whatever reason, Wonder's wotaskd eats almost double the RAM > than the vanilla one :-/ > > ---- > Pascal Robert > [email protected] > > AIM: MacTICanada > Twitter : MacTICanada > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/macti > WO Community profile : http://wocommunity.org/page/member?name=probert > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
