I think that should be fine. You might want to plan out how you are going to qualify this for fetches.
On Jul 10, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Joe Moreno wrote: > Is it possible for EOF to support a reflexive relationship back to the same > Entity with the same relationship property name through a flattened > many-to-many? > > Think of a User entity in the case of LinkedIn where users are "linked" to > other users: > User <---->>Connection<<---->User > > Connection is the flattened (EOGenericRecord) m:n table with only the foreign > keys as its two primary keys. User.connections simply returns all the > connected users. > > I'm imagining that you'd link them up like this: > userA.addObjectToBothSidesOfRelationshipWithKey(userB, "connection"); > > Any one with experience/gotchas doing this? (No inheritance involved.) > > Thanks, > Joe > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40global-village.net > > This email sent to [email protected] -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
