Don't forget that tools don't work as well if you're not on a Mac. Rule editor is non-existent.
-Mike On Nov 12, 2010, at 2:01 PM, Pascal Robert wrote: > > Le 2010-11-12 à 13:58, David LeBer a écrit : > >> >> On 2010-11-12, at 1:33 PM, Chuck Hill wrote: >> >>> On Nov 12, 2010, at 4:50 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote: >>>> >>>> I honestly don't see what Apple gains by forbidding me and my coworkers to >>>> use WO. >>> >>> The question at this point is what would they gain by allowing it? >> >> >> Does Apple really care? Yes I know that clause is in the license. But does >> anyone really think that Apple would expend the effort to come after someone >> who decided to develop WO on a generic linux box instead of a Mac? >> >> My sense is that we are so far outside their worldview that we don't even >> rate the effort. >> >> And as preemptive 'yes I understand that' statement: I do understand that >> the fact that the clause is there is all it takes as a deterrent for some, >> and I am not passing judgement. > > I agree that Apple might not care at all, but I think the problem is more > with lawyers working at your organization that may say "you can't use this! > Apple will go after us! ". > > > -- > Pascal Robert > prob...@macti.ca > > AIM/iChat : MacTICanada > LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/macti > Twitter : pascal_robert > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mgargano%40escholar.com > > This email sent to mgarg...@escholar.com > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
