On Nov 30, 2010, at 10:42 AM, John Larson wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2010, at 12:28 PM, Chuck Hill <ch...@global-village.net> wrote:
>>
>> As an alternative to this:
>>
>>> - eliminate or reduce the ec undo stack size.
>>
>> You can call undoManager().removeAllActions() after a successful save. To
>> make this even easier, I use an EC subclass with this code:
>>
>> /**
>> * Overridden to clear undo stack after a successful save.
>> */
>> public void saveChanges()
>> {
>> super.saveChanges();
>> if (undoManager() != null)
>> {
>> undoManager().removeAllActions();
>> }
>> }
>>
>>
>> Chuck
>
> Since I'm scared to death of subclassing the factory in ERXEC,I totally understand. I am not using ERXEC. :-) Chuck > I attach a listener in my BIG framework principal that listens for ec did > save and do this same code there. I have a property that enables this > function so I can disable it if an app needs it. -- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
