> On 15/01/2011, at 2:12 PM, Mike Schrag wrote: > >> I'm all for Q's approach, too. For me, Ivy is the part of Maven that isn't >> so bad. You get the dependency management without all the other stuff on top. > > And, of course, you can interpret 'all the other stuff on top' in one of two > ways: > a) negatively, which seems to be the way this particular community keeps the > myth going that it'll be too much pain. (Perhaps certain people have a > hang-over from maven 1?). > b) positively, as meaning all the additional benefits maven provides and with > less pain overall.
and of course you can present the two possible interpretations as a) a myth b) you're right or a) my personal experience b) you're wrong it's all a matter of perspective ;) more seriously, though -- you just have to try it out for yourself and see if you like it. i don't. it's not an objective judgement of maven, it's a subjective judgement of maven. ms _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
