Those acknowledgements are required if you are using some types of open source licenses like LGPL. Those do not constitute proper licensing for project wonder
Dov Rosenberg On May 9, 2011, at 6:14 PM, "Ramsey Gurley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On May 9, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Dov Rosenberg wrote: > >> Just having gone thru an extensive software audit of all of the third party >> licensing that our company uses (including WebObjects and Project Wonder >> among a zillion other things). I would like to propose that Project Wonder >> adopt a more consistent license for the code base. The best licenses for >> open source products to use so that commercial products can utilize those >> components are Apache 2.0, BSD, and MIT. It would be best to include the >> license file in the download for binary and source for WOProject and Project >> Wonder. Right now I think these items are under an old NetStruxr license >> thru objectstyle. It was very difficult to find the license files for >> Project Wonder and WOProject >> >> Any component licensed under GPL, LGPL 3.0, EPL, CPL were poison to us and >> we had to remove them. LGPL v2.1 components sucked less and we were allowed >> to keep them as long as we didn't modify them in any way. >> >> Dov Rosenberg > > http://wiki.objectstyle.org/confluence/display/WONDER/Acknowledgements > > Ramsey > _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
