The preferred way is whichever way you prefer :) If it feels too verbose, don't use it. They're doing (give or take) the same thing internally.
ms On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Roger Perryman <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Mike! That clears up some of the fog. I'm still not sure what the > "preferred" way is for the community, though. Or is there a preferred way? > The annotations are VERY verbose and remind me of Spring/Struts. > > On Nov 29, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Mike Schrag wrote: > >>>> I never used the annotations. The only time I would use them is if I have >>>> to register like 100 controllers, just to not have to do it in Application. >>> >>> If you are not using the @PathParam annotation, then how do you specify the >>> parameters for the method? I assume you would use routeObjectForKey to >>> access them. Does this mean there is no formal method signature? This would >>> be similar to accessing parameters from a DirectAction call. >> yes … route controller methods ARE direct actions (if you look at the >> inheritance hierarchy, you'll see that your controller is a DirectAction). >> so without the trickery of the annotations, you would lookup the parameters >> using the routeObjectForKey methods, or you can just fall back to standard >> DA tools and call request().stringFormValueForKey(..) etc. >> >> ms > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40pobox.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
