On 21/03/2013, at 1:36 AM, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2013-03-20, at 3:12 AM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> 
>> On 20/03/2013, at 2:49 PM, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>> David Avendasora had an improved delegate that I think he mentioned 
>>> committing to Wonder.  Maybe he has not gotten around to it?  Logically, 
>>> you can't have mandatory circular relationships without deferred constraint 
>>> handling.
>> 
>> Unless I've not looked closely enough at my own model, half of the circle 
>> here is optional, which should be alright.  (Shouldn't it?)  Does the 
>> ERXEntityDependencyOrderingDelegate look to see whether the relationships 
>> are optional/mandatory and make allowances, or does it just get as far as 
>> seeing that there's a cycle?
> 
> My version just stopped when it saw a cycle.  I think.  I have not used it in 
> years.

Yeah, it seems to.  I meant "alright" in a more general sense.  Anyway, I'll 
look at disabling constraint checking altogether (just for functional testing 
purposes).  Unless Dave wakes up and tells me he has something awesome up his 
sleeve.


-- 
Paul Hoadley
http://logicsquad.net/



 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to