On Mar 22, 2013, at 10:24 AM, Jürgen Tabert <jtab...@htgreenline.de> wrote:
> But this leads to the question why the Entity Modeler generates the useless > sequences for the subclasses > and omits the sequence for the abstract class. If no table name is defined on > the abstract class the runtime uses the class name to create the > needed sequence. > > In my case the Entity Modeler can't generate a table for the abstract class > because I didn't define a table name. There will never be an entity > of this class. You ought to be able to define a name, the abstract super-class can be thought of as a template for the sub-class construction in EOF. The fact that you worry about that name generating an additional <table.> in relationship expressions is a different problem. > > Jürgen Baiss Eric Magnusson cascadewebdesign.com _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
