Hi Ralf and Alexis, Thanks for your answers. The command line length doesn’t look like an indispensable advantage (unless you’re deploying on Windows). I’m going to recommend WOInject users to avoid running applications using the WOBootstrap.jar.
Cheers, Henrique On 03/12/2013, at 18:12, Alexis Tual <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > the command line length is the only reason I can think of. ps auxwww | grep > java is pretty ugly with this... jps -v is better though. > For several month of production with woinject, that's the only drawback we > faced for the moment :) > > Alex > > > > > 2013/12/2 Ralf Schuchardt <[email protected]> > Am 02.12.2013 um 13:58 schrieb Henrique Prange <[email protected]>: > > > Hey guys, > > > > Silly question: what is the importance/advantage of running WO applications > > from WOBootstrap.jar? > > > > It looks like WOBootstrap just make things complicated. It uses an > > alternative class loader and the original classpath is incomplete. > > So, considering this drawbacks, which advantages are provided by this > > mechanism of WO app initialization compared to the old way (calling the > > main method directly)? > > > > Cheers, > > Henrique > > > Hi Henrique, > > WOBootstrap allows the use of long classpaths esp. on Windows, where the > maximum command line length was sometimes limited to only 2047 characters. > > Ralf > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/alexis.tual%40gmail.com > > This email sent to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
