Chuck,

thanks!

It looks like the cleanest possible solution indeed. Alas the drawback is that 
the change won't be located nicely to one place -- I would have to find all the 
places in code anyone makes an EC, and change its class.

To be frank, I am not even sure which WebObjects/WOnder services might create 
an EC...

(a) session creates defaultEC, that will have to be fixed somehow,
(b) my own (ERXEC|EOEditingContext).newEditingContext calls throughout the 
whole project,
(c) anything else to be wary of?

Or is there perhaps a Java/WOnder trick I am not aware of, which would allow me 
to create an ERXEC subclass, and globally set it up so that “wherever and 
how-ever an EC gets created, it will always be my class”?

Thanks a lot,
OC

On 21. 3. 2016, at 21:23, Chuck Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

> As a first idea, you could make an EC subclass that was able to identify 
> these ready only instances and not call super in deleteObject().
> 
> Chuck
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 2016-03-21, 1:17 PM, 
> "[email protected] on behalf of OC" 
> <[email protected] on behalf of 
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Hello there,
>> 
>> is there a trick to “undelete” an object in editing context?
>> 
>> Before saveChanges, I go through ec.deletedObjects(), and in some very 
>> special cases, I might find that an object should NOT be deleted. Just like 
>> it has never been added to deletedObjects at all.
>> 
>> I've tried to insertObject it immediately; that works all right for the 
>> object itself, but still removes its owned :1 relationships, which is also 
>> quite wrong.
>> 
>> Is there a way to do it right?
>> 
>> Note: if there was a way to mark specific objects as read-only (never to be 
>> deleted, never to be updated), it would be even better; but I've tried to 
>> override isReadOnly, and it does not seem to be even called from 
>> saveChanges. I can't make R/O the whole entity: it applies to only some of 
>> its objects. I can't throw from validateForDelete either: I don't want 
>> saveChanges to fail. I need it to work all right with all the other objects, 
>> just not deleting a couple of special ones (nor their owning relationships).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> OC
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>> https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/chill%40gevityinc.com
>> 
>> This email sent to [email protected]


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      ([email protected])
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to