Hi Paul, Thanks for looking into this and bonus points for thinking of the maven users!
From what I see, the two frameworks in "Mail" are not being considered for maven builds. Meaning the maven build contains the version from "Core" for now. To move forward we'd have to: * add a pom file to the "Mail" directory to build ERJavaMail in the new location * update the groupId in the ERJavaMail pom file * update the groupId in the dependencyManagement section of the main pom file Which will be easy to do, so I'd say: go ahead! Fabian > Am 08.09.2016 um 02:21 schrieb Paul Hoadley <[email protected]>: > > Hello, > > As noted by Flavio in another thread, there seems to be two versions of > ERJavaMail in the Wonder repo. > > 1. Ray committed fe953bf8 on 5 October 2015. This commit copies ERJavaMail > from Frameworks/Core to Frameworks/Mail, without deleting the former. It also > updates Build/build/build.xml so that the version in Frameworks/Mail is the > one being built. Additionally it puts ERCMail.framework in Frameworks/Mail, > though I don't know where this came from. (Ray's log message suggests this > was factored out of the business logic framework, though there are no changes > anywhere else, just additions to Frameworks/Mail, in this commit.) > > 2. Build/build/build.xml still shows that it's the Frameworks/Mail version > being built for the ERJavaMail.all target. If you download the frameworks > from the WOCommunity Jenkins, you can see it’s still got the JARs from 2015, > for example, none of the updates. > > 3. Meanwhile, the version in Frameworks/Core has had a whole bunch of commits > since 5 October 2015, including removal of deprecated methods, updates to > libraries, bumps to Java settings, and so on. > > I’d be tempted to do this: > > 1. Delete Frameworks/Mail/ERJavaMail. There have been no updates to this > point in the tree since it was moved there. > > 2. Move Frameworks/Core/ERJavaMail to Frameworks/Mail/ERJavaMail. Why? > Because that’s what is currently being built, so it shouldn’t require any > build changes, and otherwise ERCMail would be orphaned in Frameworks/Mail. > > Any thoughts? Is this likely to have any Maven side-effects? (That’s not > something I would know how to test.) > > > -- > Paul Hoadley > http://logicsquad.net/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/lists.fabian%40e-lumo.com > > This email sent to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
