Very true. Ironically, I think my couple of years away from WO, doing java-only, probably improved me the most as a WO programmer. When I came back I had a vastly different approach to WO—it was no longer the center of my development universe, but rather just another framework to be integrated with other best-of-breed tools. And using it like that makes it even better.
- hugi > On 24 Jun 2017, at 01:05, Chuck Hill <ch...@gevityinc.com> wrote: > > As you use more modern Java tools and libraries, it become increasingly > important to recognize the differences between “The WO Way” and “The Java > Way”. Trying to force one to be the other is a recipe for pain. As you have > experienced. :-) WOLifecyle needs to evolve. > > Chuck > > From: Paul Hoadley <pa...@logicsquad.net> > Date: Friday, June 23, 2017 at 5:48 PM > To: Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is> > Cc: Chuck Hill <ch...@gevityinc.com>, WebObjects Development > <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> > Subject: Re: java.util.logging and Maven builds > > Hi Hugi, > > On 23 Jun 2017, at 6:17 pm, Hugi Thordarson <h...@karlmenn.is > <mailto:h...@karlmenn.is>> wrote: > > I’m stumped—any Maven aficionados want to chime in? > > WOLifecycle modifies the maven standard behaviour by enlisting src/resources > for WO bundle resources only (equivalent to /Resources in Fluffy Bunny). > However, the Eclipse compiler doesn't know about WOLifecycle's eccentricities > and will continue to behaves as if the project is a standard maven project > and copy the resources in src/main to target/classes. That's why everything > works during development and blows up in production. > > I've mentioned that we should really change this behaviour: Make WOLifecycle > handle src/resources like a standard maven java project does and then add a > separate folder for WO bundle resources (app-resources, wo-resources or > something like that). You can see a bit of discussion in #maven on Slack on > January 24th. Unfortunately I haven't had the time to actually *do* anything > about that :). > > Ah, yes—I remember the discussion. I also remember not quite having a > concrete understanding of the problem or how the solution would help. Now > that this has bitten me, I know _exactly_ what you’re talking about! > > If you'd like, here's a workaround: You can force maven to copy the java > resources (or certain resources). But of course, this is less than optimal. > > https://gist.github.com/hugith/a2ece8632ab33b994403ff9a04722fc1 > <https://gist.github.com/hugith/a2ece8632ab33b994403ff9a04722fc1> > > Thanks Hugi I’ll check that out. > > > -- > Paul Hoadley > http://logicsquad.net/ <http://logicsquad.net/> > https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/ > > >
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
