Hmmmm, I've just got a bugreport from the production, and looks like we have again bumped into the rare problem that (seemingly) sometimes ERXEnterpriseObject.updateInverseRelationships fails to update the :N relationship, as detailed below in my June e-mail.
Nobody happened to encounter a similar problem lately, or perhaps, even better, find a culprit and fix that? Thanks a lot! OC > On 7. 6. 2023, at 11:12, OCsite via Webobjects-dev > <webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > pretty rarely, but alas repeatedly — something like, twice a year — our > clients observe a weird behaviour that > - they add “a row to a table”, means an eo into a standard 1:N relationship; > - immediately after that, they do not see the newly added row in the GUI, nor > do see it newly logged-in users, means their table.rows relationship does not > contain the new one; > - in awhile, or if the app happens to be restarted, immediately after the new > launch, the problem disappears. > > Not surprisingly, so far we haven't found any way to trigger the problem > intentionally :( > > We have never observed similar problem with other relationships — which might > just as well mean it never happened, or that it does happen too, but just > never got noticed so far :) > > I went repeatedly through the logs and so far found no reliable explanation, > but eventually it occurred to me if > ERXEnterpriseObject.updateInverseRelationships (which we use to keep all our > relationships in sync) happened to fail somehow, it would, I believe, cause > precisely the observed behaviour: the new object would be set up all right, > it would get its proper :1 relationship to the table (the appropriate FK > would be set and eventually saved to the DB all right), but the table's :N > inverse, for some weird reason, would not get updated to contain the new > object. New sessions (well all new ECs whichever way they are created) would > get the wrong (not-updated) relationship from table to rows from the to-many > snapshot, until the EC timestamp lag times out. When it does (or when the app > gets relaunched), the relationships gets re-fetched from the database, which > fixes the problem. > > My primary question is, has anybody lately observed any problems with > ERXEnterpriseObject.updateInverseRelationships reliability? > > Thanks! > OC
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (Webobjects-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com