Hi Ricardo, On 26 Oct 2025, at 00:07, Ricardo Parada via Webobjects-dev <[email protected]> wrote:
> I’ve seen Wonder seems to use this plugin: > > <plugin> > <groupId>org.wocommunity</groupI> > <artifactId>wolifecycle-maven-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.5</version> > </plugin> > > But I’ve also seen in the SimpleWOApp from Ramsey this one: > > <plugin> > <groupId>io.github.wocommunity</groupI> > <artifactId>wolifecycle-maven-plugin</artifactId> > <version>2.7</version> > </plugin> > > This one the version is 2.7. Does anybody know the differences between these > two? Which one should we use? The latest here is 2.5, and that's what we're using: https://github.com/wocommunity/wolifecycle-maven-plugin > Also, our projects still use the Fluffy Bunny layout: > > Sources/ > Resources/ > WebServerResources/ > … > > When the frameworks build I noticed that the .jar file is not including the > Resources folder which is causing some exceptions. Should Resources be > included inside the .jar file? Yes. You can get Maven to build from Fluffy Bunny layout (Wonder is still organised this way—check out the POMs there if you want to do this), but converting to standard Maven layout is easy. This should still work: https://gist.github.com/paulhoadley/cd15b90c94eb8c640fddd9ac3fbbc6dc > Also, the application seems to be built with all Frameworks embedded within > the app. What determines whether or not frameworks are embedded in the > application? There's no such option. The Maven-built bundle is self-contained and ready to run. -- Paul Hoadley https://logicsquad.net/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/logic-squad/
