BearXu wrote: > I still think the philosophy bechind the web.py is better. > but web2py's some idea is better: > prevent security issues > Ajax > a ticket system > > > 2008/1/11, Tzury Bar Yochay < [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > > Tell this to all the framework lovers out there. > I am proud to be a lover of this anti-framework framework. > > > On Jan 10, 3:25 pm, BearXu <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Oh, Everyone should see this framework I > thought.http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/examples/default/index > > > > It seems like a combination of Rails and Django
Before this turns into a "better than"-discussion, I'd like to say that, as far as I know, there is no "best" framework; it all depends on the circumstances. If you like to be in full control and like minimalistic frameworks, web.py. If you want to have a nice web2.0 looking app with all the ajax and easy db usage you can think of; rails. etc. Anyway, I'm no expert on other frameworks (actually, web.py is pretty much the only thing I ever actually used), so I can not say I know what I am talking about, but this is the idea I am getting. Thanks for showing us this other framework, though :) that on itself is interesting. greetings, b^4 P.S.: Why did they change their name to web2py? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
