Thanks Hraban, Looks like that's the case with all the Python web frameworks - maybe I'll have to start with 2.6 after all.
Alan On 25 Oct, 17:37, Hraban Luyat <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 06:03 -0700, aharrisreid wrote: > > > I am very much new to Python, and one of my first projects is a simple > > data-based website. Therefore I am looking for the easiest way to get > > Python up-and-running on the web, and from my research so far, web.py > > looks to be a contender. However, looking to the future, I am > > starting with Python 3.1 (I can hear many of you shouting "don't - > > start with 2.6"), so I need to know - is web.py compatible with 3.1 > > yet. If not, is development in the pipeline? > > > Many thanks, > > Alan > > Well, I would not say "start with 2.6" explicitly, and actually, it is > often mentioned by `pythonistas' that people new to Python should start > with Py3k. Unfortunately, you are out of luck with web.py... > > Greetings, > > Hraban Luyat --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
