Thanks Branko ... made my day ... actually its night here ... :) On Jan 12, 10:10 pm, Branko Vukelić <[email protected]> wrote: > One very good point: never use auth libraries that doesn't come with > extensive test coverate. Some have recommended to me repoze.who > (authentication) and repose.what (authorisation). Repoze comes with a > good reputation of being well-documented and well-tested code base, so > I think it's a better choice. > > > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Dexter <[email protected]> wrote: > > No replies :( > > > On Jan 12, 12:48 am, Dexter <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Stubled upon this one when I was planning to write a full fledged > >> authentication > >> systemhttp://groups.google.com/group/webpy/browse_thread/thread/322fd3e9482... > > >> As per the discussion it seems to be a good solution. > >> Any comments or suggestions before I go ahead and implement it. > > >> By the way Pablo I would like to help if you plan to implement it as a > >> standard module of webpy ... well depends on Aaron if it gets > >> integrated... and yeah I would be more interested to do it for > >> appengine. > > >> Thanks & Regards > >> PK > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "web.py" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected]. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en. > > -- > Branko Vukelic > > [email protected]http://www.brankovukelic.com/
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
