I DO AGREE, haha, too late. 在 2006年2月23日星期四UTC+8下午10时59分26秒，Aaron Swartz写道：
> > Inventing yet another template language... > > You don't have to use it -- each part of web.py is completely separate > from the others. But you're right, it is "yet another template > language". And I'm not going to apologize for it. > > The goal of web.py is to build the ideal way to make web apps. If > reinventing old things with only small differences were necessary to > achieve this goal, I would defend reinventing them. The difference > between the ideal way and the almost-ideal way is, as Mark Twain > suggested, the difference between the lighting and the lightning bug. > > But these aren't just small differences. Instead of exposing Python > objects, web.py allows you to build HTTP responses. Instead of trying > to make the database look like an object, web.py makes the database > easier to use. And instead of coming up with yet another way to write > HTML, the web.py template system tries to bring Python into HTML. Not > many other people are really trying to do that. > > You can disagree that these ways are better and say why. But simply > criticizing them for being different is a waste of time. Yes, they are > different. That's the whole point. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/webpy/-/J5dPuCPy-0MJ. To post to this group, send email to webpy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to webpy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
