you mean "backwards compatibility",yes ,that is good,but "developing actively" will be a good signal for someone want to use webpy on their real project, and that's means webpy user can get good comunity support.
On Monday, August 13, 2012 4:14:28 AM UTC+8, Nickname wrote: > > On 2012-08-11 23:02, qinmugong wrote: > > i think webpy is less active than other framework like django or flask > .i > > use webpy for a while and i really like the way it works, just have a > > little of worry about the future of webpy! > > The fact that web.py is "less active" is a major advantage for > me. web.py does more or less what it should, so I'm happy that > my application will (hopefully) not break tomorrow, when there > is an important bug fix. Python 3 support is desirable, IMHO. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/webpy/-/xjeZz8JCrh8J. To post to this group, send email to webpy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to webpy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
