On Sunday, 2 June 2013 23:16:09 UTC-3, Anand wrote: > > > On Friday, May 31, 2013, Tomas Schertel wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, 27 May 2013 11:17:35 UTC-3, Tomas Schertel wrote: >>> >>> On Monday, 27 May 2013 11:08:20 UTC-3, Tomas Schertel wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 16 May 2013 10:02:21 UTC-3, Anand wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> I've been wondering from long time about how to move forward about >>>>> web.py development. Here is the summary of my thoughts. >>>>> >>>>> Main Priorities: >>>>> >>>>> * Python3 support >>>>> >>>>> Python 3 is the future. We should make web.py ready for it. >>>>> >>>>> * Better integration with third-party tools >>>>> >>>>> web.py has not been very good at supporting integration with >>>>> third-party tools and making it easier for other people to write some >>>>> kind >>>>> of extensions to web.py. I think this is very important for the adoption >>>>> of >>>>> web.py. >>>>> >>>>> * Fixing the earlier design mistakes >>>>> >>>>> There are some design mistakes that I would like to fix. >>>>> >>>>> - The web.database module depends the request locals, which is a >>>>> design mistake. I've started a new project to make the database module of >>>>> web.py independent of other part of web.py. It is still work in progress. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/anandology/**sqlpy<https://github.com/anandology/sqlpy> >>>>> >>>>> - We haven't got the form API is right. I've always extended form >>>>> class, overwritten some important methods, etc, whenever I've tried to >>>>> use >>>>> it. This needs to be improved. >>>>> >>>>> - Sessions. This another part of web.py that I'm not happy about. May >>>>> be this should have been an extension instead of core part of web.py. >>>>> I'm >>>>> not really sure what to do about this. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know your thoughts about this. >>>>> >>>>> If there are any parts of web.py that you think need to be improved, >>>>> or an API is not right, please let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Anand >>>>> >>>> >>>> Is pypy support planned? >>>> uWSGI now works with pypy[1]. Maybe web.py could support it too. >>>> >>>> [1] - >>>> http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.**org/en/latest/PyPy.html<http://uwsgi-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/PyPy.html> >>>> >>> >>> Armin Ronacher, from Jinja2, wrote about his experience on making Jinja2 >>> support both python 2 and python3. >>> >>> [1] - >>> http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2013/**5/21/porting-to-python-3-**redux/<http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2013/5/21/porting-to-python-3-redux/> >>> >> >> Hey Anand, where are you? :) >> > > Yes, I'm around. I've already seen that Armin's article. Lets see how our > porting goes. > > Anand > > -- > Anand > http://anandology.com/
Hi Anand. I'm just trying to help you out, ok? Have you seen these resources? http://www.getpython3.com/#resources Any news on migration? See ya. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to webpy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to webpy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
