On 2011-08-06 01:34, =JeffH wrote:
...
12. Removed any and all dependencies on
[I-D.draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15], instead depending
on [RFC2616] only. Fixes issue ticket #12
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/websec/trac/ticket/12>.
...
Not sure this is a good idea.
The current text copies a known bug from
draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-15 (see
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/1340>).
Also, the ABNF claims it's based on RFC 2616's definitions, but mentions
RFC 3986 in ABNF comments. This needs to be checked.
Furthermore, there's a risk that HTTPbis will have to tune the
definition of Effective Request URI furthermore -- see
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/222>. (I realize
that's not your fault, but we somehow have to deal with this).
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
