>>> Section 3: Are the latter two paragraphs really necessary? I only find >>> such >>> statements useful when minimum conformance is not the same thing as full >>> conformance. >> >> It's apparently helpful for readers with a strong W3C-style spec background. >> I'll leave them in. > > It might be a good idea, then, to put something like the following in > at the beginning of the section: > > [[IESG Note: This section is for readers with a background in W3C > specification style, of which we expect many. RFC Editor, please > remove this note before publication.]] > > This will avoid the same question/complaint from ADs during IESG evaluation. > > I also suggest that you move the 2119 paragraph to the end of the > section, to keep all three compliance-related paragraphs together.
thx, the above is done in the -09 working copy. =JeffH _______________________________________________ websec mailing list websec@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
