On 27/08/2012 21:18, Tobias Gondrom wrote:
Hello dear websec fellows,
<hat="WG chair">
we have so far only very few comments regarding this. If you feel
strongly either way, please say so ASAP, within the next 5 days (until
Sep-1), otherwise we will have to go with the few comments we received
to judge consensus based on them.
<hat type="participant">
I don't have strong feelings either way. I don't believe we have many
(if any at all) standardized extensions anyway.
If people believe that there would be extensions, I have a slight
preference for picking an IANA policy now. Probably IETF review.
Thank you, Tobias
On 27/08/12 21:01, =JeffH wrote:
On 08/20/2012 10:55 AM, =JeffH wrote:> Thanks for the clarification
Barry. Yes, this question is in response to Ben
> Campbell's review comment (which I was going to note, but you took
care of it :)
>
> > "We need to decide on an IANA policy *or* explicitly decide that we
> > don't want to choose that now, and leave it to whoever creates the
> > registry later."
>
> yes, that's a more accurate statement of the decision.
>
> Either way is fine by me.
Do we have a decision on this as yet?
thanks,
=JeffH
_______________________________________________
websec mailing list
websec@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
