Unfortunately, that's a correct bounce - those e-mail addresses are no
longer valid.
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
Jennifer Pioch wrote:
> The email servers at Sun have problems, can someone look at it, please?
>
> Jenny
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Internet Mail Delivery <[email protected]>
> Date: Jan 27, 2009 6:09 PM
> Subject: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed
> To: [email protected]
>
>
> This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
>
> Message-id: <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:09:24 +0100
>
> From: Jennifer Pioch <[email protected]>
>
> To: April Chin <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by [email protected]
>
>
> Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
>
> Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]
> Original address: [email protected]
> Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
> Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1
> <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]>... User unknown
> Remote system: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com
> (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25)
> Recipient address: @sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]
> Original address: [email protected]
> Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
> Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.1.1
> <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]>... User unknown
> Remote system: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com
> (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25)
>
>
> Original-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
> Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
> Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com
> (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25)
> Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1
> <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]>... User unknown
>
> Original-recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
> Final-recipient: rfc822;@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.1.1 (Remote SMTP server has rejected address)
> Remote-MTA: dns;sunmail3mpk.sfbay.sun.com
> (TCP|129.147.4.11|39984|129.146.11.52|25)
> Diagnostic-code: smtp;550 5.1.1
> <@sunmail2sca.sfbay.sun.com:[email protected]>... User unknown
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Jennifer Pioch <[email protected]>
> To: April Chin <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:09:24 +0100
> Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by [email protected]
> April, can I use it?
>
> On 1/13/09, Jennifer Pioch <[email protected]> wrote:
> > April, can I use the RTI in the public?
> >
> > Jenny
> >
> >
> > On 12/23/08, April Chin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > John,
> > >
> > > I don't think the RTI contains any non-public info, and it is already
> > > being CC'd to outside folks (code reviewers). It does
> reference OSR info,
> > > which I normally put in the private bug Comments field.
> > >
> > > Do you see any problem with cc-ing RTI's on opensolaris mailing lists?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > April
> > >
> > >
> > > > Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 23:12:22 +0100
> > > > From: Jennifer Pioch <[email protected]>
> > > > Subject: Re: WebRTI: RTI 328911 was resubmitted by [email protected]
> > > > To: April Chin <[email protected]>
> > > > Cc: [email protected], [email protected],
> [email protected],
> > > [email protected], [email protected], [email protected],
> > > [email protected]
> > > > Content-disposition: inline
> > > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=googlemail.com;
> > > s=gamma;
> h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to
> > > :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
> > > :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
> > > bh=TsGApMdTORlxNXKCy8tRlBcsUZIpU9pXDxUAj39QMU0=;
> > > b=eoNCgsyT2keRzH02RSSi3Ekw5sjLvGBU42mjUrUaWQ4KEnCIUmdbLu9c/xRU8c1Hk3
> > > qtIGXrJWYuoeJgNGzjLH8nXT7L1zX409y80rmwNMuW3yzqhP1fr/GDNtvn2k+m2j407m
> > > 2V2YVmhtWuZPYJCZpminfUIyS5I6b5bf3xdFw=
> > > > DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
> d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
> > > h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version
> > > :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition
> :references;
> > > b=KTsH8W4pepJ98EeMA2yp7ESZBBVl+3ckWAf3banP27K82fPkKkXMCRv8JY/fvtAKIa
> > > rjW3XEyU0IHsD4grgImjFEZW9vRnjITVZXtaI+S63Hkkls2kWa/p2q4CyhTLoeLDD95q
> > > v8Q2Vo+SbKHUgM//yrM9zwdzn4kJb66D3xeSk=
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/23/08, April Chin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I apologize for the multiple WebRTI submissions...
> > > > > it seems the "hg outgoing -v" output (1900 files)
> > > > > is too large for the
> > > > > "putback -n" field, and it was getting truncated.
> > > > >
> > > > > So I'm putting "putback -n" overflow into the Comments field,
> > > > > although I apparently can only add one Comment at a time, so I
> need
> > > > > to resubmit again...
> > > > >
> > > > > Please bear with me.
> > > >
> > > > I do. Can you include [email protected]
> > > > to the list of RTI recipients so the RTI process is archived? I am
> > > > giving a talk as part of a graded performance test and wish to use
> the
> > > > RTI as reference material.
> > > >
> > > > Jenny
> > > > --
> > > > Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt
> >
>
>
> --
> Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
