Jim Grisanzio writes: > We'll not lose any critical history and here's why: active groups > maintain their content and infrastructure very well, and their stuff > will be moved over to the new site. Once there, XWiki will provide a > convenient content management system for page histories, etc. However, > there is no need to move over empty groups or piles of abandoned > content. If we can delete that stuff, that would be helpful.
I would recommend checking out the dicussion that occurred over in networking-discuss. There's a substantial part of the engineering community that disagrees vehemently with that assertion: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=103471&tstart=0 ... and is in fact quite surprised and dismayed that removing old projects is even under discussion. (Personally, I *do* agree, and I think that old projects ought to be flushed, and that the real problem here is a lack of a good design documentation repository and a lack of process related to integrating that sort of crucial information. I'm pretty much alone in that, though.) -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
