On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Alan Burlison<[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > >> The structures apply to the community governance; website operations >> aren't directly tied to that. > > That's stated as if it is fact, unfortunately it isn't, not for the current > implementation and not for the new one either. As I've already said, we > have merely migrated the existing data, not restructured the roles.
The existing website app ties webpage editing rights to a "leader" roll that is in no way connected to either the Core Contributor governance role or the Contributor constitutional one. Please don't try to rewrite history... > Until > such a change is approved by the Community, we have no mandate to change > anything. And with all due respect, the OGB doesn't have the power to > unilaterally make that change either, it needs ratifying by the Community as > a whole. Yet you/your team seem comfortable taking the mandate to unilaterally invent and decide things for UG's and P's without said constitutional or community backing. You can't have it both ways... Once again we seem to be at loggerheads rather than working together to improve things. Why? -John _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
