On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Alan Burlison <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > >> [With my governance hat on.] >> >> Is there a way we can get a list of collectives that have >> no leaders? >> >> (Or, even worse, no affiliates and therefore nobody who can >> fix any pages.) >> >> And then how do we go about fixing that up so that each >> collective has at least one leader? > > I can manually pull a list from the database for you. And we can remove the > collectives or add people as necessary.
That would be handy, thanks! At least it would help gauge the scale of the problem. (I know it's a problem, because I'm in a CG thus affected - namely observability.) What would the procedure be for such an affected group to unstick itself? A request from X to Y, but who is qualified to make the request and who do they send it to? > As a longer-term fix we want to add some summary screens to Auth, one of > which could show each collective with counts of the different classes of > member. To do that we'll have to add nightly processing to generate the > summaries - we don't want to be scanning the entire database each time it is > displayed. We also want to add nightly processing to cater for CC grants > that expire, so the affected people automatically get C grants. Plus there's > other stuff such as audit log pruning etc - there are a number of changes > and bugfixes we've been holding off on until after the XWiki migration was > complete. Enough to keep you busy :-) Thanks for all this. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
