On Wed, 4 Nov 2009, Alan Burlison wrote:
Valerie Bubb Fenwick wrote:
So, if I understand this, I could then say on the Security community
main page: aggregate all blogs for all Security Core Contributors?
or Core and regular contributors?
We'd be doing it for Leaders and Affiliates rather than CCs and Cs, CC and C
are electorate-only roles. But the effect would be the same.
My initial thought was to provide feed info for both Leaders and Affiliates
for CGs - basically, any role that can't be self-assigned, so that there's a
degree of vetting. However we could probably provide a knob to select just
Leaders, or both Leaders and Affiliates.
Ah, yes, I'm mixing old terminology with new ones. Thank you for
clarifying (you'd think I'd get that straight!)
If yes, then that is very cool and I like it :-)
It's a yes.
I do wonder if we could also then limit it in someway, like we have
a project for Crypto under the Security community, and only have those
blogs for members of the crypto team (I don't know how auth would know
this, but if there was some selector type thing...)
As far as Auth is concerned there's no real difference between CGs, UGs and
Ps so the same mechanism would work for selecting (say) the Leaders and
Developers in a Project, or the Leaders and Affiliates in a User Group.
VERY COOL! Thank you! :-)
Valerie
--
Valerie Fenwick, http://blogs.sun.com/bubbva/ @bubbva
Solaris Security Technologies, Developer, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
17 Network Circle, Menlo Park, CA, 94025.
_______________________________________________
website-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
