On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Alan Burlison <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > >> My request at this point is sort of the opposite of the above: I think the >> electorate assignments I've checked are correct. However, for the >> following >> communities: >> >> hpcdev >> ldoms >> observability >> printing >> >> the correction process has left the community leaderless. I suggest that >> making all CCs leaders in those cases would allow those communities to >> actually manage themselves. (And if they want to change the list of >> leaders >> they can do so - at the moment they're stuck. And adding all the CCs as >> leaders and then handing over control is probably easier than trying to >> work out the leader list.) > > Thanks for checking and your suggestion seems completely sensible to me... > >> I think the same is true for the distribution community as well, although >> John Plocher may wish to advise on that one. > > Sure, again that makes sense. > >> Does this message serve as an adequate request, or do you want me >> to log a bug? (Although I couldn't spot an obvious category to file it >> under.) > > I'd just log it under the 'grants' category, it's close enough and will make > it easier to find in the future.
Logged. #14585 http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=14585 > Perhaps we need a 'community setup' > category in bugzilla as well? I can add one if required. That's probably not a bad idea. If ever the leadership of a community gets out of whack in the future, that would make it easier to fix it. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/ _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
