Hi Benjamin, *, On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Benjamin Horst <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > Of the platforms mentioned so far in this thread, Drupal is the only name I > recognized. > Drupal is also used already for the OOo Extensions and Templates sites,
And those are sites with notorious performance issues. I don't know what measures to handle it the admins used though. Please: Don't fullquote. Experience shows again and again that people who top-post and fullquote didn't take the time to read what was written before. And of course it makes the discussion harder to follow. The point "use a well known one since there people will not have problems using it" is void. Ease of use doesn't come with popularity. But yes, an established history of course also helps. As for static pages: Yes, I'd really prefer this, since that would also allow copying the static pages to a completely different host easily and eliminates the reason for a performance penalty in the first place. memory-caches can still be used of course. ciao Christian -- To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to [email protected] List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.
