On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 12:57 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Italo Vignoli wrote: > > On 6/19/11 11:25 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > > > Could you suggest another description that we could use that would be > > > more appropriate for us? > > I think that we should use "free software license, preferably copyleft" > > Just "free software license" linked to > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html would exactly match with the
+1 (since that seems to be the accepted policy might as well keep it sweet and simple) > RMS quote on http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/ and would > include both free-permissive licenses (Apache) and free-copyleft > licenses (LGPL). > > Anything else would be a new interpretation of the original statement > and would exclude (or discourage) some free software from the extensions > repository, but of course > the Steering Committee is free to decide on > the policy of the LibreOffice websites -1 (but that is a different subject) > regardless of RMS's quotes from > months ago. > > Regards, > Andrea. > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+h...@global.libreoffice.org Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
