On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 01:08:28PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > Backports has 4.0.3 because there's no sense to jump on every version which > still needs to be tested to be exposed to stable users. And 3.5, yeah, it > sucks > but 3.6 was't ready by the time wheezy was frozen...
Besides that, I uploaded dthe 4.0.x backport quickly after 4.0.x was in unstable. (factually breaking the rules, but LO has a exception for important updates. 3.5-Y>4.0 is so). Otherwise the policy is "take from testing". 4.1 will follow when it's tested in unstable... Should I tell you what hinders in from entering testing now? $ grep-excuses libreoffice libreoffice (1:4.0.3-3 to 1:4.1.0-2) Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers Too young, only 1 of 10 days old [ missing builds on armel, armhd, kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64 ] [ RC bug which is fixed ] Not considered Depends: libreoffice kde-runtime (not considered) Depends: libreoffice liborcus (not considered) Depends: libreoffice mdds (not considered) Depends: libreoffice python3-defaults (not considered) Thus it's blocked by a) being too young b) by the KDE people adding a stricter depends and that one's blocked due to a bug c) new dependencies LO 4.1 has. d) python3-defaults because python3.3-uno was just a workaround and now it's back to sane packaging, but with the caveat that it needs the new default pyton (python 3.3 IS needed, even upstream) Please tell me how I should have speeded this up? There's no way out of the waiting time and no, I am not going to use internal libraries. Regards, Rene -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted