David Soria Parra wrote:
> I do not know much about python, but I think it is not a good idea to
> use 2.6. In 2.6 a lot of functions were deprecated to make people aware
> what will change in 3.0. Therefore a lot of deprecated warnings are
> thrown in python applications. Mercurial had some issues with that in
> the lsat weeks and I guess it's not the online app that has problems
> with that.
>
interesting... there's plenty of information that considers 2.6 to be
backwards compatible, but most references don't mention the extra
deprecation warnings
something I noticed (checked in OpenSolaris b111a): amp-dev depends on
SUNWpython-twisted which depends on SUNWpython (2.4)... b111a has a
SUNWpython25-twisted but not a SUNWpython26-twisted
I dunno exactly which Python ancillary packages in the base repo we
consider to be part of the web stack anyway. The web stack repo has a
number of python packages, and they depend on SUNWpython (2.4).
> David
>
> Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
>> It looks like Python 2.6 (SUNWpython26) has the fewest anciliary
>> packages, Python 2.5 has a few more (SUNWpython25-twisted-web2,
>> SUNWpython25-simplejson, SUNWpython25-cssutils, SUNWpython25-twisted,
>> SUNWlibpigment-python25), and Python 2.4 has by far the most.
>>
>>
>> (Try "pkg search -r python2.x", where x is {4,5,6})
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>> webstack-discuss mailing list
>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>>
>
>
