Arvind Srinivasan wrote:
> Thava Alagu wrote:
>
>>>> /usr/postgres/phppgadmin
>>>>
>>> Why would this be under postgres? I expected to see /usr/phppgadmin
>>> (since phppgadmin is a top-level directory in /etc).
>>>
>>>
>> we try to organize all postgres related software under /usr/postgres
>> to avoid cluttering of /usr space.
>>
>
> In that case, why /etc/phppgadmin and not /etc/postgres/phppgadmin? Is it
> common to have different "base" locations under /etc vs /usr? If the two were
> the same, that's one less difference for a user to remember/learn.
>
>
/etc already has enough files at top level, so it does not really
seem to matter if you add
some more. :-) However, it may be worth trying to keep /usr with
hierarchical organization of dirs.
Having said that, it is not consistent with what most other linux
distributions do -- they package this
under /usr/phppgadmin. There is also /usr/pgadmin3, the postgres admin
tool at /usr level.
For consistency sake, it is probably better to go with /usr/phppgadmin
instead of /usr/postgres/phppgadmin --
I will make this change if I don't hear any other strong preferences.
>> exploring the apache config files.
>> just thinking may be a good idea to provide both -- a symbolic link :
>> /etc/phppgadmin/apache22.conf -->
>> /etc/apache2/2.2/samples-conf.d/phppgadmin.conf
>>
>
> imo, the actual conf file should be under the phppgadmin area and the symlink
> should be from apache2-->phppgadmin and not the other way around.
>
>
That sounds good to me.
-thava
> Arvind
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/webstack-discuss/attachments/20080624/7c2902d7/attachment.html>
