Sriram Natarajan wrote: > HI > You are welcome to try out PHP 5.2.6 from our webstack repository and > give us your valuable feedback > > From your OpenSolaris 2008.05, > > 1. remove the existing apache/php glue, If in case, you have already > installed amp packages on your system > > pfexec pkg uninstall SUNWapch22m-php5 -> remove the 5.2.4 version of > apache / php glue package
just to clarify : you are removing this SUNWapch22m-php5 as it does not exist anymore with php 5.2.6 but is replaced with SUNWapch22m-php52 ? correct ? but why changing the name ? in case user want to maintain 2 different php releases machines ? Jean > > 2. If you have not install any Apache / MySQL packages package, now > would be a good time > pfexec pkg install SUNWapch22 SUNWmysql5 > > 3. and enable the SMF services by doing some thing like > pfexec /usr/sbin/svccfg import > /var/svc/manifest/network/http-apache22.xml > pfexec /usr/sbin/svccfg import > /var/svc/manifest/application/database/mysql.xml > > pfexec /usr/sbin/svcadm enable http:apache22 > pfexec /usr/sbin/svcadm enable mysql:version_50 > > 4. finally , download php 5.2.6 binaries from web stack repository by > doing some thing like > pfexec pkg set-authority -O http://pkg.opensolaris.org/webstack webstack > > pfexec pkg refresh > > pfexec pkg install pkg://webstack/php526-devtest > > > With these, you should be able to get your php applications working out > of the box. > Hope this helps > sriram > > Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> Hi >> Thanks for all the feedback . I have an updated ARC draft to integrate >> PHP 5.2.6 within OpenSolaris (Not much has changed except to include >> PHP SNMP as a separate package - why separate package - mainly because >> of its dependencies..) >> >> http://wikis.sun.com/download/attachments/10390064/php-526-arc-draft-v2.txt >> >> I am hoping to get these integrated in time for build 97 . Your >> earliest response on this will be much appreciated. >> >> Jyri - Will you kindly consider sponsoring this case within ARC ? >> >> thanks >> sriram >> >> >> >> Glynn Foster wrote: >> >>> On 12/07/2008, at 10:51 AM, Peter Tribble wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> One can argue that it is nice to distribute each individual >>>>> extension in a >>>>> separate package (there by reducing the dependency on core runtime >>>>> package) >>>>> but it introduces a huge maintenance headache for both customers as >>>>> well as >>>>> developers to ensure that every extension that a developer wants is >>>>> installed on the production system. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> As an administrator, one of the biggest headaches is packages with >>>> unnecessary >>>> dependencies bringing those unnecessary dependencies onto a system. >>>> >>>> Do developers want this? I've never been asked to install the snmp >>>> extension on >>>> any of my servers running php, and can't really see a typical >>>> developer system >>>> having any need for it. >>>> >>>> >>> I think I'd agree with Peter here, but obviously from a user >>> experience point of view, you'd at least want to be able to download a >>> core set of common extensions that most people use in a convenient >>> way. Maybe there's an opportunity to make that judgement for the user, >>> package all the other extensions separately, and as feedback comes in, >>> re-assess that core package. >>> >>> >>> Glynn >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> webstack-discuss mailing list >>> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > > > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
