Sriram Natarajan wrote:
> Hi
>   I was wondering, if I can hear every one's thoughts as to should we 
> deliver a symbolic link of apache, php and mysql binaries (at least some 
> of the most commonly) used under /usr/bin ? For example, some of the 
> commonly used binaries like ab, apxs, httpd, httpd.worker, php, php-cgi, 
> mysql, mysqladmin should have a symbolic link under /usr/bin ? One 
> argument for having this under /usr/bin is they are easy to access and 
> customer clearly knows about this ?  Currently, none of this are 
> delivered under /usr/bin and users are expected to set 
> /usr/<component>/<version> in their PATH before using these. Do we still 
> follow the same pattern  ?
>
>  If we are going to create symbolic link, then what will be the expected 
> behavior if a newer version of these components are integrated ? Will 
> the newer version of components simply over write the symbolic links to 
> point to the newer version ?
>   
The new version simply overwrites the symbolic links .
Thanks for starting this thread ,even for MySQL this was a big 
requirement and we did away with the symbolic links in 5.1.



> thanks
> sriram
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> webstack-discuss mailing list
> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss
>   


-- 
Sunanda Menon
Database Technology Group
BLR03, x87098/91-80-66937098


Reply via email to