Do you have ARC approval in the current state ? If not, then you could include this issue in the current ARC case . Also, please note that upstack components like PHP need to be updated to include the the proper dependency. Not sure, which other components depend on mysql . So, discussing this within the ARC case would be a good first step.
Also, why do you want to integrate both mysql 5.0 as well as 5.1 ? is it because of backward compatibility concerns ? - Sriram Sunanda Menon wrote: > The RFE is 6728729:MySQL should have libraries in separate > > I would like to take that up separately after this Integration is done > as we have already filed the PKG RTI and ARC case etc ,so to go and > do the rework at this stage won't be possible . > > We shall take it up separately . > > Thanks Sunanda > > Jyri Virkki wrote: >> On Aug 6, 2008, at 12:40 PM, Sriram Natarajan wrote: >> >> >>> IMO, your team might want to consider splitting MySQL 5.0 base package >>> into core database server and client runtime libraries at the earliest >>> possible. The same should also happen for MySQL 5.1 as well. >>> >> >> +1 >> I filed this RFE some time ago (can't look up the CR# right now). >> Such a packaging split is easiest to introduce at the same time as the >> new version packages, so the best time to do it is alongside >> 5.1 integration. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> >> webstack-discuss mailing list >> webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >> > > > -- > Sunanda Menon > Database Technology Group > BLR03, x87098/91-80-66937098 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > > > webstack-discuss mailing list > webstack-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/webstack-discuss >
