rahul wrote: > | Can you also point out as to why these modules warrant a specific > | 'SUNWapch2m' package and why they are not being delivered with the rest > | of the Apache modules > > It is so that they are easier to manage. (The modules mod_jk and > mod_fcgid are going to be part of that package, and they are not part of > the apache httpd source. *ldap* modules are part of the SUNWapch2u) > If 'ldap' modules are part of Apache HTTPd source, then we should be tracking this 'ldap' module as part of Apache ARC case , isn't it ? > When mod_python/ruby/etc comes in they will also be part of the modules > package. > Hmm.. does this mean - php module for apache httpd should also be part of this package ? If not, then why the inconsistency between different components in the WebStack. On the same note, does a ruby module require Ruby runtime or other Ruby configuration file (SUNWrubyr ? ) . If yes, then the package of this module will need to appropriately capture its dependency as well, isn't it ?
thanks sriram
