Hi I seem to have accidentally sent out this earlier mail while still in composition. Here is the full content of the email that I wanted to compose earlier.
Currently, PHP 5.2.4 has been integrated within nevada build 76 and you can access the binaries from /usr/php5/5.2.4 on Nevada build 76. Now, this integration was based on the previously approved ARC case (2007/169) . As this ARC (2007/169) case didn't mention about creating appropriate symbolic links so that '/usr/php5/bin' can point to '/usr/php5/5.2.4/bin' , this issue was not addressed with our initial integration. We would like to address this issue in the upcoming next integration and add appropriate symbolic links so that they point to the latest version. For example , [sn123202 at htpasswd]'php5'>ls -la drwxr-xr-x 3 sn123202 staff 8 Nov 7 14:10 . drwxr-xr-x 17 sn123202 staff 17 Nov 2 12:06 .. drwxr-xr-x 8 sn123202 staff 8 Nov 2 12:06 5.2.4 lrwxrwxrwx 1 sn123202 staff 9 Nov 7 14:10 bin -> 5.2.4/bin lrwxrwxrwx 1 sn123202 staff 13 Nov 7 14:10 include -> 5.2.4/include lrwxrwxrwx 1 sn123202 staff 9 Nov 7 14:10 lib -> 5.2.4/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 sn123202 staff 9 Nov 7 14:10 man -> 5.2.4/man lrwxrwxrwx 1 sn123202 staff 13 Nov 7 14:10 modules -> 5.2.4/modules Does any of you see any issues with this approach ? thanks sriram Sriram Natarajan wrote: > HI > I wanted to get opinion from folks in sfwnv alias as well, Hence, I am > sending it to both 'webstack' as well as 'sfwnv' aliases. My > apologies, if you end up getting duplicate mails. > > Currently, PHP 5.2.4 has been integrated within nevada build 76 and > you can access the binaries from /usr/php5/5.2.4. Now, this > integration was based on the previously approved ARC case (2007/169) . > As this previously ARC case didn't mention a > I would like to create appropriate symbolic links within our PHP > integration so that customers can get to the latest version of PHP by > simply doing /usr/php5/bin > > I would like to ` `
