>From roland.mainz at nrubsig.org Mon Nov 26 16:34:41 2007
>> me... but while I would like things to be as consistent as they
>> can be (because todays's maintainer of the foo package may not be
>> tomorrow's) I'm not really interested in going to meetings about shell
>> style.
>
>Would you be interested to sponsor an all-in-one cleanup patch
>(including things like adding "-xtrconst" to CFLAGS (e.g. less memory
>wasted with duplicate string literals etc.) etc. ...) ?
I don't want to sponsor anything myself, it feels a bit wrong
given I'm the gatekeeper and seem to be involved in reviewing/approving
things already. But someone else could.
That's assuming everything is properly tested, one cannot just
turn on -xstrconst and assume it works of course.
Mike
