On Dec 2, 2007 7:27 PM, Jyri Virkki <Jyri.Virkki at sun.com> wrote: > Peter Tribble wrote: > > > > > > I got a quick question, are we delivering libapr and libaprutil as > > > > separate packages or as a whole in the apache? > > > > > > > For Apache 2.2.6, they are delivered as part of SUNWapch22u package. > > > > Requiring an apache server being installed in order to meet library > > dependencies seems to me to be a bad idea. > > > > (I logged 6544042 earlier; that was for the svn case.) > > > > Would it make sense to package APR separately? > > Probably make sense if there are other clients using it [as there are]. >
At least there are svn and httpd. :-) I really think libapr and libaprutil should be package separately. > As things move from the one-DVD distribution model to the a la carte > package selection there's going to be a lot of package refactoring > that needs to be done. As usual, please file bugs to track such > refactoring work in general (the above CR works for this particular case). > > I am not familiar with the snv/webstack build process, but I can help in the apr/apr-util related bug fixes to the upstream if needed. Cheers, Henry
