rahul wrote: > > | > 5.1.1 mod_jk > | > The mod_jk developers will try to keep the releases of 1.2.X > | > line compatible with each other. But this is not guaranteed in > | > case of new features that may need to be retracted due to some > | > bugs or vulnerabilities. > | > | So do you feel mod_jk Uncommitted is correct given the above? > > what do you suggest? Do you think it should be volatile?
I haven't researched mod_jk so I can't say for certain. If the project really intends to make incompatible 1.2.x releases then it might have to be. OTOH perhaps that disclaimer is only reserved for truly extreme situations and barring a major vulnerability there won't be any incompatible change? -- Jyri J. Virkki - jyri.virkki at sun.com - Sun Microsystems
