On Wed, Mar 04, 2009, rahul wrote:
> | On Tue, Mar 03, 2009, Jyri Virkki wrote:
> | > rahul wrote:
> | > >
> | > > | There is a security bug in 2.7STABLE5 -
> | > > | http://www.squid-cache.org/Advisories/SQUID-2009_1.txt
> | > > | 
> | > > | Will you now target 2.7STABLE6 instead?
> | > > 
> | > > I think this is O.K and does not require an ARC case since it
> | > > is an update in the minor version. So it would be possible to
> | > > integrate 2.7STABLE6 instead.
> | > 
> | > 2.7.* to 2.7.* is only bug fixes correct?
> | 
> | No.
> 
> do you mean that there are interface(configuration) changes between 2.7STABLE5
> and 2.7STABLE6 ? or is it a more general observation?
> 
> I went through the changeset here, wasn't sure what you meant.
> http://www.squid-cache.org/Versions/v2/2.7/changesets/SQUID_2_7_STABLE6.html

Imeant as a general observation. There may be backported features from 
Squid2.HEAD
or Squid-3, albeit unlikely at this late stage of the Squid lifecycle.



Adrian


Reply via email to