On 03/ 3/10 08:58 AM, solarg wrote: > > On 03/ 2/10 09:25 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> >> solarg wrote: >>> >>> hello all, >>> >>> i'm using the workaround is the tarball portfs_hang.tar.gz given by >>> Jeff Trawick. >>> After installing a new app that send mails, i found these warnings in >>> my logs, even if the mail is correctly send: >>> ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: >>> /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal >>> insecure pathname >>> ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: >>> /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal >>> insecure pathname >> >> In which file was LD_PRELOAD[_32] set? >> Is this new app running as a cgi? If so, did you add "PassEnv >> LD_PRELOAD[_32]" to your httpd configuration? >> >> (I'm wondering why any app besides httpd sees that setting. Adding to >> the envvars file shouldn't affect anything but httpd.) >> >> > > sorry, i forgot to add _32 in the envvars file (i have many zones, i > forgot soemone) > it's ok now >
i replied too fast, the problem is always present: ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal insecure pathname i did: cat /etc/apache2/2.2/envvars LD_PRELOAD_32=/usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so export LD_PRELOAD_32 this is a new php app, so i imagine that it is the same as an cgi app? and no, i never used PassEnv LD_PRELOAD[_32] to my httpd configuration because i'm not aware of this. I add it in /etc/apache2/2.2/httpd.conf: PassEnv LD_PRELOAD_32 but the message is still here: ld.so.1: sendmail: warning: /usr/apache2/2.2/lib/port_getn_interposer_32.so: open failed: illegal insecure pathname gerard
