We talked about this a while back, and I thought the conclusion was to
do it. It's not very complex, anyway. But let's revive the debate....
Geoff Talvola wrote:
> At 07:33 PM 6/3/2001 -0400, Jay Love wrote:
>
>> I've committed an update to use a dynamic number of threads in
>> ThreadedAppServer. All the plumbing is there and works well. I'm
>> not thrilled with the actual algorithm which determines when to
>> add/delete threads. That code is in
>> ThreadedAppServer.manageThreadCount. If someone wants to work on
>> this, please do. We should take a look at how apache does it. We
>> can be a little more aggressive than them though, as we're spawning
>> and collecting threads, not processes.
>
>
> Threads are pretty lightweight, so what's wrong with just creating all
> needed threads right up front? Variable numbers of threads just seems
> like unnecessary extra complexity to me.
>
> - Geoff
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Webware-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
