If I get my Subclassing patch done and accepted, it might be an acceptable way to add the new monitoring methodology to a ThreadedAppServer.
You could have a MonitoredAppServer class which subclasses ThreadedAppServer and adds the new style of monitoring.
-Stuart-
Ian Bicking wrote:
On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 19:23, Stuart Donaldson wrote:So what is the status of NewThreadedAppServer?Is this still intended to replace ThreadedAppServer?I'd like it to. I haven't heard much opinion on it and it would be nice to get it tested better -- I think Goeff tested it a bit on Windows, and when I'm doing development I try to use it instead of ThreadedAppServer. Nothing much has changed since I wrote it, for or against it.I noticed that the "stop" function does not work when invoked through main() because AppServer.stop() does not take named arguments.Fixed in CVS. Ian ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel http://hpc.devchannel.org/ _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
