On 01/08/2003 02:57:52 AM Ian Bicking wrote: >Damn, I didn't even know they were there. I think I got it changed so >it'll notify me now.
Wierd--I emailed you 12/29 to tell you that the notification didn't seem to be working, and that there were patches waiting. You must be filtering out my email! :-) >But being easily distractable I've started reimplementing FFK in an >attempt to simplify it, turning the form definition into a class >definition, and utilizing new-style classes and metaclasses (modeled on >SQLObject). So I'm afraid there's something of a moving target here, >which makes coordination extra hard. I think the result will be neat >though -- I'm slowly moving toward an ideal where each page is a web >service, with intermediaries (like FFK) translate the interfaces. Reimplementing FFK again? I understand why, and use the Python >= 2.2 features a lot myself. But all the unstability in the code makes it really hard to pitch in and help, or even to use it since it keeps changing... If everyone was to do a private fork of FFK to get the stability needed for production code, it will never get fully testing since one needs lots of people using the same code base in order to exercise it and get all the bugs out of it. >I've been meaning to try subversion... right now it seems to require >Apache 2, and I have other Apache 1.3 stuff. And the Debian packages >were incomplete last time I tried too. So I've finally gotten used to >CVS. I just run Apache2 alongside Apache1.3 (and I'm using Debian too). Apache2 is just too poorly supported to think about moving over to just yet. E.g., PHP still doesn't run on it. Subversion 0.16 is in the unstable branch. I installed Apache2 just to use Subversion, and I think it's well worth it. It (Subversion) is very stable and extremely easy to use. The ease of creating and managing branches, tags, merges, etc. as well as the atomic commits is just great. >Anyway, I don't know of a good CVS technique unless you can commit your >changes, at which point it's pretty straight forward. Which you are >welcome to do if you wish. Can just anyone commit to the repository? I would like to commit my changes since they're pretty basic bug fixes... ...Edmund. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel