On Monday 24 February 2003 12:07 am, Frank Barknecht wrote: > I never tried the MK-storage in UserKit, so I cannot judge it. But in > file storage there are simply a lot of not-yet-implemented features, > some are essential like saving changed users. > TODO-UserKit.text show a long list of items. > > I wasn't using Webware, when most of the work on UserKit was done or > decided, but it seems, the current active developers use another kind > of user management in their applications. And as UserKit is 'just > there', it seems to hinder further work in this area.
On one of my projects, I *did* use UserKit, but with MiddleKit for storage which is why UserKit's file storage support is non-existant. Anyone wish to volunteer? I also built user management into StockAlerts.com pre-UserKit, but it's completely intertwined with the application (which is generally private). I disagree that UserKit hinders further development. It could be extended by *anyone*, or looked at for ideas prior to writing a "UserKit" from scratch or completely ignored. No one's hands are bound... -- Chuck http://ChuckEsterbrook.com ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webware-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel
