On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:24:53 -0700
Kyle VanderBeek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I'm evaluating WebWare for possible uses at my company.  However, I'm
> distressed by how heavyweight and html-specific WebKit.Page is.  I think
> it is bothersome, a little confusing, and not very graceful when it
> comes to wanting to write a webapp that extends the toolkit.

I hear you, but what you might want to do is write a new class extending HTTPServlet
or extend Page and override _respond: I'm generating pages using webware with
SimpleTal( generating xml) -> xslt -> html by overriding Page _respond method (it was 
the
easy way ;-) )

--
Delio

PS what webware is missing IMHO is a way to cleanly set the session class to use and a 
way
to customise the url to servlet mapping policy ( unless I couldn't find them when I 
looked
at the code)


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Webware-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-devel

Reply via email to